| Chapter |
|
| 2 |
Figure 1a: Albumen cabinet card untoned, showing
typical low contrast, faded yellow. |
| 2 |
Figure 1b: Same subject, gold-toned, chocolate
brown. |
| 2 |
Figure 2a: tarnish, not revealed by side
lighting. |
| 2 |
Figure 2b: tarnish, visible with vertical
lighting |
| S3 |
Figure 3a: Cameo print, front, side-lighting. |
| S3 |
Figure 3b: Cameo print, rear, side-lighting. |
| 5 |
Figure 4: Newspaper portrait enlarged to show
halftone dot pattern. |
| 7 |
Figure 5: Daguerreotype removed from case, showing
edge tarnish. |
| 7 |
Figure 6: Ambrotype component parts. |
| 7 |
Figure 7a: Tintype, dark with poor tonal range, dark
whites. |
| 7 |
Figure 7b: Tintype, good tonal range, good
whites |
| 7 |
Figure 8: Gem tintype. |
| AI |
Figure 9: Light photo of Daguerreotype used for SEM
analysis. |
| AI |
Figure 10: SEM micrograph of Daguerreotype, low
magnification of analysis region. |
| AI |
Figure 11: SEM micrograph of Daguerreotype,
light/dark boundary. |
| AI |
Figure 12: SEM micrograph of Daguerreotype, amalgam
particles in boundary area. |
| AI |
Figure 13: SEM micrograph of Daguerreotype, high
magnification of amalgam particles. |
| AI |
Figure 14: SEM micrograph of corrosion on
Daguerreotype. |
| AII |
Figure 15: Crayon print: dimensions 16" x 20" |
| AII |
Figure 16: Original cabinet card of crayon
print. |
| AII |
Figure 17: FOTOFIND report: exposed fiber
papers. |